South Africa Coins, Notes and Mandela Coins - Blog

Archive for April, 2010

General News

April 28, 2010

Mandela to skip World Cup opening ceremony: grandson

By Adam Plowright (AFP) – 5 hours ago

NEW DELHI — Nelson Mandela plans to skip the opening ceremony of the football World Cup finals in South Africa in June and will watch the tournament from home, his grandson told AFP on Wednesday.

The news will disappoint his legions of fans and the organisers of the competition, FIFA, who had hoped he would make a rare public appearance to grace the first world soccer finals on African soil which begin on June 11.

Asked if the increasingly frail 91-year-old would be present, Chief Mandla Mandela replied: “Certainly not. My grandfather at this age is very elderly and we are not trying to intensify his programme.”

“He’s said he would prefer to be at home in the rural countryside to spend time at the farm,” Mandela, who is a member of parliament, said in an interview with AFP during a trip to India.

“What we understand is that during the World Cup he will be given the opportunity to rest in the countryside.”

A final decision will be made by the family and the Nelson Mandela Foundation closer to the start date, he added, stressing that there were no immediate health worries.

Last Friday, FIFA president Sepp Blatter said he was hopeful that Mandela, famously nervous while watching sport, would be strong enough to be guest of honour at the finals.

“We cross fingers that Nelson Mandela can realise this dream,” Blatter told reporters.

South Africa’s first black president memorably used the 1995 Rugby World Cup finals in the country as an opportunity to unite the country post-apartheid when he embraced a sport played and watched almost exclusively by whites.

After his endorsement, the team’s victory in the final was celebrated nationwide and Mandela appeared at the final dressed in the national strip and congratulated the team after their defeat of New Zealand.

His grandson, in India for South African national day celebrations, said Mandela would follow the football World Cup on television. His rural home is in Qunu in the South Africa’s Eastern Cape province, his birthplace.

“We always watch soccer with him, but unless the team is winning 2-0 he doesn’t feel comfortable,” he said. “Once it’s a tight situation, he usually walks away and says it’s too nerve-wracking.”

On repeated speculation about Mandela’s health, he said: “My grandfather has always been in good health.

“The media will always put something out to sell papers. Every time my grandfather goes to the hospital for his monthly check up at the hospital it?s used as platform to say he is ill,” he said.

He said the family’s only concern was Mandela’s knees, due to pressure on the joints from his top-heavy physique which he put to good effect as an amateur boxer in his youth.

Despite this, the former president still manages to walk around thanks to his “stubbornness” and determination, he added.

Mandela’s last public appearance was on February 11 when he visited the South African parliament to mark the 20th anniversary of his release from prison.

His agenda is generally kept secret and has been known to change at the last minute.

Mandela junior, who holds a degree in political science, won a seat in the national parliament in last year’s general election.

General News

April 25, 2010

Fifa President Hopes Mandela Opens World Cup

Fifa President Hopes Mandela Opens World Cup

Posted by Hannah Reinki on Apr 25th, 2010

Sepp Blatter, Fifa president, is looking forward that Nelson Mandela would be healthy enough to open June’s World Cup finals in South Africa.

Nelson Mandela is the former South African president and he is now 91 years old. He made his last public appearance on February 11 to commemorate the 20th anniversary of his release from prison.

Blatter is confident that the event would become successful and anticipated that more than 95 percent of tickets will be sold. He rebuffed the negative suggestions that South Africa was a bad choice to host the World Cup because it is just a developing country, however, Blatter said that African continent deserved to host the event for it has given world football.

Jerome Valcke, Fifa secretary general, is responsible for overseeing the tournament. He’s also confident that South Africa was so well prepared for it and it could even start at any time.

Source: Fifa President Hopes Mandela Opens World Cup | Daily World Buzz http://www.dailyworldbuzz.com/fifa-president-hopes-mandela-opens-world-cup/45718/#ixzz0m9A2dEQh
Via: Daily World Buzz

General News

April 13, 2010

SAIRR Today: Press Release: Statement by the South African Institute of Race Relations on the ramifications of the killing of Eugène Terre’Blanche – 6th April 2010

Racial tensions in the country appear to have increased significantly in recent weeks. This appears to be chiefly as a result of incitement by the ruling African National Congress to ‘shoot and kill’ the Afrikaner ethnic minority in the country. The anxiety around this incitement may well have influenced opinions across the broader white community. What appears to be the case is that much of the racial rapprochement that characterised the first 15 years of South Africa’s democracy is being undone. This rapprochement saw both black and white South Africans come to occupy a middle ground on race relations upon which the maintenance of future stable race relations depends.
Since 1994 the number of white farmers and their families murdered in South Africa is conservatively put at around 1 000. It may very well be much higher. There are currently an estimated 40 000 commercial farmers in the country. Over this same period in the region 250 000 South Africans out of a total current population of approximately 47 million have been murdered. Criminal violence can therefore be described as ‘rampant’ and has done considerable damage to the social fabric of the country. However, this is not to say that all murders in the country are a function of simple criminal banditry. In an environment where law and order has largely collapsed the consequences of incitement by political leaders to commit murder must be taken seriously.
Over the same period the policy measures put in place by the Government to raise the living standards of the black majority have failed to meet expectations. The key interventions of affirmative action and black economic empowerment have been exploited by the African National Congress to build a network of patronage that has made elements of its leadership extremely wealthy. The party also appears to have been so overwhelmed by corrupt tendencies that it is no longer able to act decisively against corrupt behaviour.
It has also through incompetence and poor policy been unable to address failures in the education system which are now the primary factor retarding the economic advancement of black South Africans.
At the same time the party is acutely aware that its support base of poor black South Africans has begun to turn against it. Violent protest action against the ruling party is now commonplace around the country.
In order to shore up support in the black community the ANC increasingly appears to be seeking to shift the blame for its delivery failures onto the small white ethnic minority, which today comprises well under 10% of the total population of South Africa. Here parallels may be read to the behaviour of Zanu-PF in Zimbabwe when that party realised that its political future was in peril. The ANC Youth League’s recent visit to Zanu-PF which saw it endorse that party’s ruinous polices are pertinent here.
In such an environment it is plausible to consider that the ANC’s exhortations to violence may be a contributing factor to the killing of Mr Terre’Blanche. Certainly the ANC’s protestations to the contrary seem ridiculous as the party is in effect saying that its followers pay no attention to what it says – this from a party that routinely claims that it is the manifestation of the will of all black South Africans. This is not to say that a labour dispute or some other matter could not have inflamed tensions on the Terre’Blanche farm. Rather it is to say that a number of different matters should be considered in determining the motivation for the crime.
Certainly the ANC’s exhortations to violence have created a context where the killings of white people will see a degree of suspicion falling around the party and its supporters.
It is of concern therefore that the police’s senior management are on record as saying that they will not consider a political motive or partial motive for the killing of MrTerre’Blanche. This suggests an early effort to cover up the ANC’s possible culpability for inciting the crime.
Should any allegations of a political cover-up arise in the pending murder trial of the two young men accused of the Terre’Blanche murder the political consequences could be significant. Should evidence be led that the two young men acted with what they understood to be the tacit backing of the ANC, and a causal link between their actions and incitement by the ANC be established, then the possibility of charging the ANC’s senior leadership in connection to the murder arises. Equally plausible is that the Terre’Blanche family and the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging could bring a civil suit against the ANC and the Government.
It is possible that the killing of Mr Terre’Blanche will greatly strengthen the hand of a new hardened right wing in South Africa. In life Mr Terre’Blanche attracted a small, uninfluential, and extremist following. He will not be mourned for what he stood for. However, in death he may come to represent the experiences of scores of minority groups in the country who perceive themselves as being on the receiving end of racist and now also violent abuse from the ANC. In effect therefore Mr Terre’Blanche may be seen as having been martyred for a minority cause in the country.
The implications of a resurgent right wing will be numerous. It is most unlikely that this right wing will take the form of camouflage clad henchmen on horses in shows of force. The ANC has also often, wrongly, identified groups including the political opposition, Afriforum, agricultural unions, and even this Institute as ‘the right wing’. This silly ‘red under every bed’ attitude in the ANC saw it lose the trust of many civil society and political groups. These groups could all be defined first and foremost by the common belief that they had to act within the bounds of what the Constitution prescribed.
But the ANC belittled and undermined them. It also undermined parliament, the national prosecution service, and the various human rights and other organisations that were established under the Constitution. It may yet usurp the independence of the courts and the judiciary. The result was a shutting down of many of the democratic channels that were created for citizens in the country to make the Government aware of their concerns and circumstances.
The resurgence of a new political consciousness among minorities could drive an altogether different political force. Such a movement will draw its strength chiefly from a hardening attitudes in the white community but perhaps also in the Indian and coloured communities. These will be views that in the main have come to subscribe to some or all of the following points:
  1. That the Government has corrupted and debilitated many of the country’s internal democratic processes for political or civil expression that were established under the Constitution
  2. That cooperation with the current Government of South Africa is therefore fundamentally unfeasible and therefore futile
  3. That the Government is unable to restore law and order in the country
  4. That the Government is therefore unable protect its citizens
  5. That the Government has a hostile agenda against minority groups
However it is equally, if not most likely, that many minorities who subscribe to the five points above may simply get so fed up that those who can will pack up and go. Here they may take the advice of President Zuma to remain calm as they pack up their businesses and their families and calmly board aircraft for Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the United States, and Great Britain. With the exodus will leave much of the tax and expertise base of the country.
Should the ANC, however, find itself facing increased political resistance it will in many respects have a tiger by the tail. Firstly, the ANC depends greatly on the tax income paid by white South Africans to balance South Africa’s books. Secondly, it depends entirely on the food produced by a small number of white farmers to feed the country. Thirdly, white South Africans still dominate the skills base of the country. Finally, and most importantly, much white opinion since the early 1990s has been moderate. White South Africa has been willing and often eager to cooperate with the Government in building an open, non-racial, and prosperous South Africa. Losing that cooperation will to an extent put an end to any serious chance that the ANC has of leading South Africa to become a successful and prosperous democracy.
While the ANC will be inclined to blame whites for this, and may even take drastic action to confiscate white commercial interests as they are currently doing in agriculture, these actions will be ruinous for the economy. The result of such ruin will be to drive a deeper wedge between the ANC and its traditional support base and thereby hasten the political decay of the party.
When General Constand Viljoen decided to throw his lot in with democracy in the early 1990s the right wing in South Africa was a spent force. So it should and could have remained. The ANC could have taken advantage of white expertise and tax revenue to realise their own vision of a better life for all. Things have however gone badly wrong for the party. Corruption has destroyed its ability to meet the demands of its constituents while racial bigotry has now seen it defending its image against what should have been an insignificant and dying neo-Nazi faction in the country.
The failure of sensible South Africans to take back the racial middle ground in the country will be serious. Polarisation will beget further racial conflict and a hardening of attitudes on all sides. This is perhaps the greatest leadership test that the current Government has faced and it is one that they cannot afford to fail.

– Frans Cronje